2021
Zhong, Xiaoyang; Hu, Mingming; Deetman, Sebastiaan; Steubing, Bernhard; Lin, Hai Xiang; Hernandez, Glenn Aguilar; Harpprecht, Carina; Zhang, Chunbo; Tukker, Arnold; Behrens, Paul
Global greenhouse gas emissions from residential and commercial building materials and mitigation strategies to 2060 Journal Article
In: Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021, ISSN: 20411723.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Acoustic measurements, adaptation measure, Animal husbandry, Beach sampling, Beach sediment, beach sediment citizen science, Benefits, biodiversity impacts, biodiversity loss, Black carbon, capital investment, Carbon emissions, Caribbean, China, china-us trade conflicts, circular economy, Citizen science, climate change, CO2 emissions, CO2emissions, Community, Complex terrain, Concentrated solar power, Consultation, Consumption structure, countryside species-area relationship, Cress (Lepidium sativum), Decomposition analysis, Decoupling analysis, Desulfurization technologies, Economic and social impacts, Electricity generation, Electricity sector, Electricity system, Emission projections, energy footprint, Energy models, Energy scenarios, Energy systems, Energy technology, Energy transition, energy use, energy water nexus, Energy-water nexus, Environmental, Environmental impact, environmental inequality, Environmental Justice, Environmentally extended multiregional input-outpu, EU countries, Europe, Exposure concentration, Extraction, Feed-in tariffs, Feedback and spillover effects, Flow curvature, food system, Historical drivers, Household carbon emissions, Household GHG footprints, human development, Hybrid input-output analysis, Hydraulic unbalanced forces, hydro-turbine governing system, Hydroelectric generating systems, Income inequality, Industrial CO2 emissions, industrial ecology, Input-output analysis, input–output analysis, international trade, Investment, Investment and opportunity costs, Land, Land degradation, land-use intensity, Learning curve, Lesser Antilles, Lidar observations, Lidars, Life cycle assessment, Low-carbon electricity technology, Material footprint, Mathematical model, Method standardization, Microplastics, Mineral resources, Mining, Modal interactions, MRIO model, Multi-regional input-output (MRIO) analysis, Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis, Multi-regional input-output model, multiregional input-output analysis, Nano- and micron-sized plastics, Non-fossil electricity, Operational, Perceptions, Plastic pollution, Policy goals, Poverty, Power density, power generation, Power plants, Power transmission, Primary crops, Public transit, Rebound, Remote sensing, renewable energy policy, resource efficiency, Responsibility Sharing, Sectoral analysis, Sharing economy, SO2 emission reduction, Socio-economic impact, Sodar, Solar energy, Spatial decomposition analysis, Spatial impact, Spatially explicit, Standard operating procedure, Sublethal impacts, Subnational, Subsystem input-output model, Sustainable consumption, techno-economic evaluation, Terrestrial systems, thermal emissions, Urban-rural differences, Urbanization, Vascular plant, Vulnerable passengers, water basin, water consumption, Water footprint, Water scarcity, Wind, Wind energy
@article{Zhong2021ab,
title = {Global greenhouse gas emissions from residential and commercial building materials and mitigation strategies to 2060},
author = {Xiaoyang Zhong and Mingming Hu and Sebastiaan Deetman and Bernhard Steubing and Hai Xiang Lin and Glenn Aguilar Hernandez and Carina Harpprecht and Chunbo Zhang and Arnold Tukker and Paul Behrens},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112677 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123339 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107339 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127098 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sci},
doi = {10.1038/s41467-021-26212-z},
issn = {20411723},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-07-01},
journal = {Nature Communications},
volume = {12},
number = {1},
pages = {1–10},
publisher = {Elsevier Ltd},
address = {Copenhangen},
edition = {1},
abstract = {Building stock growth around the world drives extensive material consumption and environmental impacts. Future impacts will be dependent on the level and rate of socioeconomic development, along with material use and supply strategies. Here we evaluate material-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for residential and commercial buildings along with their reduction potentials in 26 global regions by 2060. For a middle-of-the-road baseline scenario, building material-related emissions see an increase of 3.5 to 4.6 Gt CO2eq yr-1 between 2020–2060. Low- and lower-middle-income regions see rapid emission increase from 750 Mt (22% globally) in 2020 and 2.4 Gt (51%) in 2060, while higher-income regions shrink in both absolute and relative terms. Implementing several material efficiency strategies together in a High Efficiency (HE) scenario could almost half the baseline emissions. Yet, even in this scenario, the building material sector would require double its current proportional share of emissions to meet a 1.5 °C-compatible target.},
keywords = {Acoustic measurements, adaptation measure, Animal husbandry, Beach sampling, Beach sediment, beach sediment citizen science, Benefits, biodiversity impacts, biodiversity loss, Black carbon, capital investment, Carbon emissions, Caribbean, China, china-us trade conflicts, circular economy, Citizen science, climate change, CO2 emissions, CO2emissions, Community, Complex terrain, Concentrated solar power, Consultation, Consumption structure, countryside species-area relationship, Cress (Lepidium sativum), Decomposition analysis, Decoupling analysis, Desulfurization technologies, Economic and social impacts, Electricity generation, Electricity sector, Electricity system, Emission projections, energy footprint, Energy models, Energy scenarios, Energy systems, Energy technology, Energy transition, energy use, energy water nexus, Energy-water nexus, Environmental, Environmental impact, environmental inequality, Environmental Justice, Environmentally extended multiregional input-outpu, EU countries, Europe, Exposure concentration, Extraction, Feed-in tariffs, Feedback and spillover effects, Flow curvature, food system, Historical drivers, Household carbon emissions, Household GHG footprints, human development, Hybrid input-output analysis, Hydraulic unbalanced forces, hydro-turbine governing system, Hydroelectric generating systems, Income inequality, Industrial CO2 emissions, industrial ecology, Input-output analysis, input–output analysis, international trade, Investment, Investment and opportunity costs, Land, Land degradation, land-use intensity, Learning curve, Lesser Antilles, Lidar observations, Lidars, Life cycle assessment, Low-carbon electricity technology, Material footprint, Mathematical model, Method standardization, Microplastics, Mineral resources, Mining, Modal interactions, MRIO model, Multi-regional input-output (MRIO) analysis, Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis, Multi-regional input-output model, multiregional input-output analysis, Nano- and micron-sized plastics, Non-fossil electricity, Operational, Perceptions, Plastic pollution, Policy goals, Poverty, Power density, power generation, Power plants, Power transmission, Primary crops, Public transit, Rebound, Remote sensing, renewable energy policy, resource efficiency, Responsibility Sharing, Sectoral analysis, Sharing economy, SO2 emission reduction, Socio-economic impact, Sodar, Solar energy, Spatial decomposition analysis, Spatial impact, Spatially explicit, Standard operating procedure, Sublethal impacts, Subnational, Subsystem input-output model, Sustainable consumption, techno-economic evaluation, Terrestrial systems, thermal emissions, Urban-rural differences, Urbanization, Vascular plant, Vulnerable passengers, water basin, water consumption, Water footprint, Water scarcity, Wind, Wind energy},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2017
Behrens, Paul; Vliet, Michelle T. H.; Nanninga, Tijmen; Walsh, Brid; Rodrigues, Joao F D; Rodrigues, D; Vliet, Michelle T. H.; Nanninga, Tijmen; Walsh, Brid
Climate change and the vulnerability of electricity generation to water stress in the European Union Journal Article
In: Nature Energy, vol. 2, no. July, pp. 17114, 2017, ISSN: 2058-7546.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adaptation measure, climate change, energy water nexus, power generation, renewable energy policy, water basin, Water scarcity
@article{Information2017,
title = {Climate change and the vulnerability of electricity generation to water stress in the European Union},
author = {Paul Behrens and Michelle T. H. Vliet and Tijmen Nanninga and Brid Walsh and Joao F D Rodrigues and D Rodrigues and Michelle T. H. Vliet and Tijmen Nanninga and Brid Walsh},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.114 http://10.0.4.14/nenergy.2017.114 https://www.nature.com/articles/nenergy2017114#supplementary-information http://www.nature.com/articles/nenergy2017114},
doi = {10.1038/nenergy.2017.114},
issn = {2058-7546},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-07-01},
journal = {Nature Energy},
volume = {2},
number = {July},
pages = {17114},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
abstract = {Thermoelectric generation requires large amounts of water for cooling. Recent warm periods have led to curtailments in generation, highlighting concerns about security of supply. Here we assess EU-wide climate impacts for 1,326 individual thermoelectric plants and 818 water basins in 2020 and 2030. We show that, despite policy goals and a decrease in electricity-related water withdrawal, the number of regions experiencing some reduction in power availability due to water stress rises from 47 basins to 54 basins between 2014 and 2030, with further plants planned for construction in stressed basins. We examine the reasons for these pressures by including water demand for other uses. The majority of vulnerable basins lie in the Mediterranean region, with further basins in France, Germany and Poland. We investigate four adaptations, finding that increased future seawater cooling eases some pressures. This highlights the need for an integrated, basin-level approach in energy and water policy.},
keywords = {adaptation measure, climate change, energy water nexus, power generation, renewable energy policy, water basin, Water scarcity},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2016
Behrens, Paul; Rodrigues, Joao F. D.; Bras, Tiago; Silva, Carlos
Environmental, economic, and social impacts of feed-in tariffs: A Portuguese perspective 2000–2010 Journal Article
In: Applied Energy, vol. 173, pp. 309–319, 2016, ISSN: 03062619.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Economic and social impacts, Environmental, Feed-in tariffs, Hybrid input-output analysis, Investment and opportunity costs, Operational, renewable energy policy
@article{Behrens2016,
title = {Environmental, economic, and social impacts of feed-in tariffs: A Portuguese perspective 2000–2010},
author = {Paul Behrens and Joao F. D. Rodrigues and Tiago Bras and Carlos Silva},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306261916305013},
doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.044},
issn = {03062619},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-07-01},
journal = {Applied Energy},
volume = {173},
pages = {309–319},
abstract = {© 2016 The Authors. Over the past two decades, many countries have used aggressive policies such as feed-in tariffs and power purchase agreements to promote renewable energy. These policies have been very successful in several countries, initiating large changes in the structure of energy sectors, and conferring large environmental, economic, and social impacts. In this paper, we quantify these impacts over the period 2000-2010 for Portugal; a country that witnessed a substantial increase in renewable energy penetration rates, with the share of wind power in electricity production jumping from 0.4% in 2000 to 16.8% in 2010. We use a novel, hybrid energy-economic input-output model to compare the historical energy policy against a counterfactual scenario in which the surge in energy subsidies and concurrent expansion of renewable energies did not take place. We consider the impact of renewable energy policy stemming from three propagation modes - operational, investment, and opportunity costs - in both the energy sector and the rest of the economy. This is the first time such a comprehensive analysis has been undertaken. Our findings show that, in the period under consideration, the combined historical renewable energy policy and renewable energy developments yielded a clear reduction in emissions, in excess of 7.2 MtCO2eq, an increase in GDP of 1557 M€, and a creation of 160 thousand job-years. These estimates do not include opportunity costs from future FIT payments that projects built in this period may be entitled to. Therefore, this work will be of critical interest to RES-E and climate change policy makers, other scientists, and the public.},
keywords = {Economic and social impacts, Environmental, Feed-in tariffs, Hybrid input-output analysis, Investment and opportunity costs, Operational, renewable energy policy},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}